[winflop]

[quote author=SUBuddha link=topic=14620.msg156917#msg156917 date=1456021604]
[quote author=norcard link=topic=14620.msg156909#msg156909 date=1456014651]
We're debating about a guy that has trouble breaking a 1500 out of 2400 out of multiple tries (essentially very basic math, writing, and vocabulary).  Think about that for a second.  Let's not inflate our academic standards here.

If Stanford does what most do that 1500 is on the 2 part test.
[/quote]

If that is a 1500 on math and verbal, he will be trying for a few more years.  It is definitely 3 part.
[/quote]

If he had a 1500 on a 2-part SAT he would NOT be retaking.  Must be a 3-part, and I agree that 1500 is too low

[winflop]

[quote author=SUBuddha link=topic=14620.msg156917#msg156917 date=1456021604]
[quote author=norcard link=topic=14620.msg156909#msg156909 date=1456014651]
We're debating about a guy that has trouble breaking a 1500 out of 2400 out of multiple tries (essentially very basic math, writing, and vocabulary).  Think about that for a second.  Let's not inflate our academic standards here.

If Stanford does what most do that 1500 is on the 2 part test.
[/quote]

If that is a 1500 on math and verbal, he will be trying for a few more years.  It is definitely 3 part.
[/quote]

If he had a 1500 on a 2-part SAT he would NOT be retaking.  Must be a 3-part, and I agree that 1500 is too low