[winflop]

http://www.ruleoftree.com/2016/3/15/1122...ark-madsen

Really disappointing article.  Only one guy on that list I'd have in my "first wave" Archie Miller

Collins: No HC experience at any level, plus wouldn't be available until well after recruiting cycle.  We saw what that did when Dawkins was hired = no bueno
Madsen: not enough experience - not even close.  Potentially a great hire as an assistant but doubt he'd take the job.
Johnson: Pretty much a failed HC.  Bowlsby didn't want to keep him, and he's been fired twice since.
Bennett: NCAA violation concerns me.  If none of my top choices panned out I'd call him
Amaker: Not successful, and NO MORE DOOKIES

Also Reveno should not be considered.  Like Amaker, not successful.  But Reveno could be a good assistant esp if the HC doesn't have a Stanford connection.

But like others have said, Few & Turner would be my first two calls.

[winflop]

http://www.ruleoftree.com/2016/3/15/1122...ark-madsen

Really disappointing article.  Only one guy on that list I'd have in my "first wave" Archie Miller

Collins: No HC experience at any level, plus wouldn't be available until well after recruiting cycle.  We saw what that did when Dawkins was hired = no bueno
Madsen: not enough experience - not even close.  Potentially a great hire as an assistant but doubt he'd take the job.
Johnson: Pretty much a failed HC.  Bowlsby didn't want to keep him, and he's been fired twice since.
Bennett: NCAA violation concerns me.  If none of my top choices panned out I'd call him
Amaker: Not successful, and NO MORE DOOKIES

Also Reveno should not be considered.  Like Amaker, not successful.  But Reveno could be a good assistant esp if the HC doesn't have a Stanford connection.

But like others have said, Few & Turner would be my first two calls.