[Redrum]

Talking about a team that, under Tedford,  averaged 7.5 wins per year.  Not too long ago we would have considered that a miracle come true if the coach with that kind of record wore red instead.  For perspective,  you have to go back,  waaay back,  to the brief tenure of Bill Walsh I  in the 1970s to find a Stanford coach with a better avg. yearly wins.  His Royal Ungratefulness only averaged 6.2 wins per year.    The only problem with Tedford is his inability to break out of the "good" ranks into the "great" ranks.  Well, that...and the fact he's a weenie.

Above average is a good assessment of Tedford so far.

[Redrum]

Talking about a team that, under Tedford,  averaged 7.5 wins per year.  Not too long ago we would have considered that a miracle come true if the coach with that kind of record wore red instead.  For perspective,  you have to go back,  waaay back,  to the brief tenure of Bill Walsh I  in the 1970s to find a Stanford coach with a better avg. yearly wins.  His Royal Ungratefulness only averaged 6.2 wins per year.    The only problem with Tedford is his inability to break out of the "good" ranks into the "great" ranks.  Well, that...and the fact he's a weenie.

Above average is a good assessment of Tedford so far.