09-25-2011, 06:38 PM
Well, Wilner's a boob but many of his ratings are at least somewhat defensible, except rating Oregon over Stanford. Both resumes feature wins over weakish teams. One resume has multiple road wins; the other does not. That other resume also has a loss on it. Somehow Wilner decides--despite his alleged emphasis on resume, resume, resume--that the other resume is better than Stanford's.