[fullmetal]

[quote author=fullmetal link=topic=15166.msg164610#msg164610 date=1465337997]
One may argue that's what happened with this private party hosted outside the auspices of the previously-stated campus party alcohol policies.

Is it clear this was the case? (i.e. private party outside the campus party policies)

I saw some speculation to this effect above, but never saw it stated or any clear reason to believe it so. I did a bit of a search for articles about the party - and again I never saw the nature of the party specified, but I did see enough references to people outside the fraternity coming to the party that it would seem to not qualify as a private party.
[/quote]

If the party was registered as an open party and also required attendees to have a Stanford ID on them...then whoever threw the party is really busted.

[fullmetal]

[quote author=fullmetal link=topic=15166.msg164610#msg164610 date=1465337997]
One may argue that's what happened with this private party hosted outside the auspices of the previously-stated campus party alcohol policies.

Is it clear this was the case? (i.e. private party outside the campus party policies)

I saw some speculation to this effect above, but never saw it stated or any clear reason to believe it so. I did a bit of a search for articles about the party - and again I never saw the nature of the party specified, but I did see enough references to people outside the fraternity coming to the party that it would seem to not qualify as a private party.
[/quote]

If the party was registered as an open party and also required attendees to have a Stanford ID on them...then whoever threw the party is really busted.