[martyup]

It seems that the legal definition of consent is changing.  According to an article in The Telegraph:

The offence of rape has continued to become more complex, and malleable, as the result of three cases from the higher courts. If you thought rape is only where a man uses violence against a woman to have sex you would be wrong – violence is not necessary. If you thought rape is where a man has sex with a woman without her consent – you would be right but consent is not black and white. A man could be guilty of rape if he ‘tricks’ a women into bed; if he agrees to use a condom but then removes it or damages it; or, if he agrees to withdraw from her but refuses to at the end. So the offence of rape now definitely does not just concern the knife-wielding maniac in the alleyway.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-...s-how.html

Mick is right.  It's getting very perilous out there for young men who just want to get laid. 

[martyup]

It seems that the legal definition of consent is changing.  According to an article in The Telegraph:

The offence of rape has continued to become more complex, and malleable, as the result of three cases from the higher courts. If you thought rape is only where a man uses violence against a woman to have sex you would be wrong – violence is not necessary. If you thought rape is where a man has sex with a woman without her consent – you would be right but consent is not black and white. A man could be guilty of rape if he ‘tricks’ a women into bed; if he agrees to use a condom but then removes it or damages it; or, if he agrees to withdraw from her but refuses to at the end. So the offence of rape now definitely does not just concern the knife-wielding maniac in the alleyway.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-...s-how.html

Mick is right.  It's getting very perilous out there for young men who just want to get laid.