[dabigv13]

The Daily Mail is hardly reputable, and the way they jazz things up in this case is typical.

We don't know if that was the victim's breasts. It's not even clear that Brock Turner sent any photo of breasts. Maybe it was another girl from  a party that night, or maybe it was another person in the group who sent a photo of a breast. We don't know that there was a "cover up". What's the point of giving out his teammate's personal information, as if he was involved? Is it really relevant that Turner used marijuana or MDMA in the past?

[dabigv13]

The Daily Mail is hardly reputable, and the way they jazz things up in this case is typical.

We don't know if that was the victim's breasts. It's not even clear that Brock Turner sent any photo of breasts. Maybe it was another girl from  a party that night, or maybe it was another person in the group who sent a photo of a breast. We don't know that there was a "cover up". What's the point of giving out his teammate's personal information, as if he was involved? Is it really relevant that Turner used marijuana or MDMA in the past?