[81alum]

That is so wrong on so many levels.  1) Paying himself large sums for what should be charitable work.  2) Nepotism.  3) Making the fund a private SC affair.  Yes, this was the man who was supposedly ethical.  This is truly sleazy.  I wonder if he violated any laws?

[81alum]

That is so wrong on so many levels.  1) Paying himself large sums for what should be charitable work.  2) Nepotism.  3) Making the fund a private SC affair.  Yes, this was the man who was supposedly ethical.  This is truly sleazy.  I wonder if he violated any laws?