[oldalum]

I keep reading in memorializing stories that she graduated 100% of her players who "completed their eligibility at Tennessee." Is this statistic as great as it sounds, or is it just padded mythologizing of someone who doesn't really need it?

What does this mean--i.e., what paths could/did players follow that are not included in this statistic? How does it compare to APR? The most recent average 4-year rolling-average APR for all NCAA W basketball programs is 978; Tennessee's is 979, which seems very average to me (Stanford's is 1000). Looking at the past 11 4-year rolling-average APR scores, all 11 of Stanford W basketball's scores exceed 979, while only 3 of Tennessee's scores do. Tennessee has only one 1000 score, we have 4.

Thanks.

[oldalum]

I keep reading in memorializing stories that she graduated 100% of her players who "completed their eligibility at Tennessee." Is this statistic as great as it sounds, or is it just padded mythologizing of someone who doesn't really need it?

What does this mean--i.e., what paths could/did players follow that are not included in this statistic? How does it compare to APR? The most recent average 4-year rolling-average APR for all NCAA W basketball programs is 978; Tennessee's is 979, which seems very average to me (Stanford's is 1000). Looking at the past 11 4-year rolling-average APR scores, all 11 of Stanford W basketball's scores exceed 979, while only 3 of Tennessee's scores do. Tennessee has only one 1000 score, we have 4.

Thanks.