08-11-2016, 07:01 AM
Is Stanford the least covered top 10 program in history? The national media covers the program, Stanford puts out video packages, and individual players are covered, but the day-to-day reporting and access is exceptionally weak. Cal's Rivals site reports on every Cal practice and Cal's media department posts video interviews of players and coaches after every practice, for comparison.
I thought the first Stanford padded practice was suppose to have happened, but no reports or anything I can find. Stanford does a first day of practice video, in slow motion, with fancy music, but that's it, and not what this fan cares about anyway. I'm not even sure how many practices there have been since Sunday. Utterly clueless about who looked good, etc.
Don't you want to feed fan interest if you're Stanford Football? And doesn't Stanford Football know the real fans want to know about what is going on in practices? Even if the media isn't allowed to cover them, the coaches and players could still be made available for press interviews.
I thought the first Stanford padded practice was suppose to have happened, but no reports or anything I can find. Stanford does a first day of practice video, in slow motion, with fancy music, but that's it, and not what this fan cares about anyway. I'm not even sure how many practices there have been since Sunday. Utterly clueless about who looked good, etc.
Don't you want to feed fan interest if you're Stanford Football? And doesn't Stanford Football know the real fans want to know about what is going on in practices? Even if the media isn't allowed to cover them, the coaches and players could still be made available for press interviews.