[stupac2]

Now that Shaw has decided on Burns as the starter I would think he would want to give him as much playing time as possible before he has to face U$C and the rest. So assuming he plays reasonably well against KSU, I wouldn't expect to see a lot of Chryst.
Who knows, though.

Especially because Shaw has a weird habit of saying that the #2 guy is going to get experience and then not doing it. I pointed this out upthread, but all last year he was saying that they needed to get Burns/Chryst into games and get real experience, and then just flat-out did not do that (they probably could've played 5X as many snaps as they did without costing us any chance at winning). So if Burns starts, I'd expect to see him in there for 90% of the snaps, even if we're winning handily.

[stupac2]

Now that Shaw has decided on Burns as the starter I would think he would want to give him as much playing time as possible before he has to face U$C and the rest. So assuming he plays reasonably well against KSU, I wouldn't expect to see a lot of Chryst.
Who knows, though.

Especially because Shaw has a weird habit of saying that the #2 guy is going to get experience and then not doing it. I pointed this out upthread, but all last year he was saying that they needed to get Burns/Chryst into games and get real experience, and then just flat-out did not do that (they probably could've played 5X as many snaps as they did without costing us any chance at winning). So if Burns starts, I'd expect to see him in there for 90% of the snaps, even if we're winning handily.