09-06-2016, 09:33 AM
Was everyone at the event over 21? Tend to doubt it.Â
Given Stanford's never ending bad publicity related to an intoxicated former varsity athlete, I am willing to give the University and the AD a pass here. If the club team doesn't have a single person under 21 on the team, then it might be a bit harsh. My guess would be the logic for the action was not a new policy, but rather rules/laws related to alcohol at organized events with under age attendees.
Given Stanford's never ending bad publicity related to an intoxicated former varsity athlete, I am willing to give the University and the AD a pass here. If the club team doesn't have a single person under 21 on the team, then it might be a bit harsh. My guess would be the logic for the action was not a new policy, but rather rules/laws related to alcohol at organized events with under age attendees.