11-22-2016, 01:19 PM
Notre Dame just didn't win. Maybe. "The school must vacate the victories in which the players appeared while ineligible. It is not clear how many of the 21 games those players participated in." Kelly mentioned Oklahoma, Wake Forest, and "All Those Teams." Either Stanford doesn't rise to the level of being named, which would be odd given the fairly epic nature of the finish in 2012 (I mean what was so noteworthy about beating flippin' Wake Forest?), or maybe those players that cheated didn't play against Stanford in 2012.
"Monstrous" is going a little far isn't it? A student trainer helped some football players cheat without anyone's prior knowledge. But they eventually figured it out and dealt with it. I bet they win their appeal for the vacated wins. I mean the NCAA being completely fair and honest across the spectrum of their discipline and all.....
Also, this is the same level of violation (Level II) that Stanford was convicted of (if that's the right term) earlier this year and Stanford didn't have to vacate any wins for games in which Cajuste played. Same $5,000 fine. I think we can only be on a low to medium height horse on this one.
"Monstrous" is going a little far isn't it? A student trainer helped some football players cheat without anyone's prior knowledge. But they eventually figured it out and dealt with it. I bet they win their appeal for the vacated wins. I mean the NCAA being completely fair and honest across the spectrum of their discipline and all.....
Also, this is the same level of violation (Level II) that Stanford was convicted of (if that's the right term) earlier this year and Stanford didn't have to vacate any wins for games in which Cajuste played. Same $5,000 fine. I think we can only be on a low to medium height horse on this one.
Yeah, I just stare at my desk, but it looks like I'm working .I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work. Peter Gibbons