[81alum]

It has made the LA Times:

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me...story.html

And here is the nub of it:

"We are concerned about the risk and liability to the university community, and to Stanford’s reputation, if Band’s conduct and behaviors continue,” the panel wrote.

Notice that the emphasis on "liability" and "reputation." 

While I seldom agree with the Stanford Review, its piece seemed powerful, particularly as it pointed out the disparity between the way the Band has been treated and the alcohol soaked frat parties that continue apace.  It is becoming obvious that this is selective enforcement.

[81alum]

It has made the LA Times:

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me...story.html

And here is the nub of it:

"We are concerned about the risk and liability to the university community, and to Stanford’s reputation, if Band’s conduct and behaviors continue,” the panel wrote.

Notice that the emphasis on "liability" and "reputation." 

While I seldom agree with the Stanford Review, its piece seemed powerful, particularly as it pointed out the disparity between the way the Band has been treated and the alcohol soaked frat parties that continue apace.  It is becoming obvious that this is selective enforcement.