01-11-2017, 06:50 PM
I think this comes up every time we discuss freshmen and their readiness to play immediately, but is there any comprehensive evidence that:
1) Stanford plays fewer freshmen on offense than other teams; and,
2) that, if it does, it's not related to their being bad (you'd think freshmen would find it easier to crack a bad team than a good one); and,
3) it's not related to Stanford's recruiting strengths (e.g. OL) being tilted to positions where it's easier to play immediately?
I don't think there is!
Anyway the team has had its most success on offense with QBs who have started as redshirt freshmen, not three or four years in; and it just started a true freshman OL during its best offensive stretch in 2016. Anecdotal, of course, but hardly consistent with an offense that's too difficult for freshmen to learn. At least, you'd think.
1) Stanford plays fewer freshmen on offense than other teams; and,
2) that, if it does, it's not related to their being bad (you'd think freshmen would find it easier to crack a bad team than a good one); and,
3) it's not related to Stanford's recruiting strengths (e.g. OL) being tilted to positions where it's easier to play immediately?
I don't think there is!
Anyway the team has had its most success on offense with QBs who have started as redshirt freshmen, not three or four years in; and it just started a true freshman OL during its best offensive stretch in 2016. Anecdotal, of course, but hardly consistent with an offense that's too difficult for freshmen to learn. At least, you'd think.
