[d4cohn]

No news on the coaching front today, which means there is a non-insignificant chance that Bernard and Earl don't make a change. If that turns out to be the case, I just keep thinking back to a quote from the AD three years ago that appeared in the SF Gate: "The resignation, announced Monday by athletic director Bernard Muir, may be a sign that the bar is being raised much higher for sports on the Farm. According to sources close to the athletic department, most Stanford teams are now expected to contend not just for postseason tournaments but for national championships."

Link: http://www.sfgate.com/collegesports/arti...523792.php

I hope I am proven wrong, but keeping a coach who has gone 4-68 in Pac-12 play in three years is antithesis to the pursuit of excellence that has defined Stanford and its AD.

[d4cohn]

No news on the coaching front today, which means there is a non-insignificant chance that Bernard and Earl don't make a change. If that turns out to be the case, I just keep thinking back to a quote from the AD three years ago that appeared in the SF Gate: "The resignation, announced Monday by athletic director Bernard Muir, may be a sign that the bar is being raised much higher for sports on the Farm. According to sources close to the athletic department, most Stanford teams are now expected to contend not just for postseason tournaments but for national championships."

Link: http://www.sfgate.com/collegesports/arti...523792.php

I hope I am proven wrong, but keeping a coach who has gone 4-68 in Pac-12 play in three years is antithesis to the pursuit of excellence that has defined Stanford and its AD.