[johnnyo53]

[quote author=johnnyo53 link=topic=17240.msg198196#msg198196 date=1503855926]
ONLY 2 SACKS AGAINST RICE IS SOMEWHAT INDICATIVE OF THE DLINE QUESTIONS...

WELL COWBOY,  SURELY YOU DONT THINK RICE'S OLINE COMPARES TO SC, UW, ETC...AND NO LINE'S GOOD ENOUGH TO PREVENT "COVERAGE SACKS" CAUSED BY OUR DEFENSIVE BACKFIELD WHICH APPEARS SOLID, AND OUR SUPPOSEDLY SOLID LB CORP, SO SPLAIN TO ME AGAIN WHY ONLY TWO AGAINST THIS ESSENTIALLY D2 TEAM?  I'M JUST FROM MISSOURI ON OUR FRONT 7.

Not sure if this is the reason but prior to the game, a few articles listed the strengths of the Rice team and an experienced OL was one of the few.
[/quote]

[johnnyo53]

[quote author=johnnyo53 link=topic=17240.msg198196#msg198196 date=1503855926]
ONLY 2 SACKS AGAINST RICE IS SOMEWHAT INDICATIVE OF THE DLINE QUESTIONS...

WELL COWBOY,  SURELY YOU DONT THINK RICE'S OLINE COMPARES TO SC, UW, ETC...AND NO LINE'S GOOD ENOUGH TO PREVENT "COVERAGE SACKS" CAUSED BY OUR DEFENSIVE BACKFIELD WHICH APPEARS SOLID, AND OUR SUPPOSEDLY SOLID LB CORP, SO SPLAIN TO ME AGAIN WHY ONLY TWO AGAINST THIS ESSENTIALLY D2 TEAM?  I'M JUST FROM MISSOURI ON OUR FRONT 7.

Not sure if this is the reason but prior to the game, a few articles listed the strengths of the Rice team and an experienced OL was one of the few.
[/quote]