[CTcard]

Depth chart is up - http://www.gostanford.com/documents/2017..._state.pdf

I'll save you a trip.  Starting QB is listed as Chryst OR Costello.

A few other notes,

- At one CB spot this list is Holder OR Murphy.
I am assuming that is because Holder will be out for the first half vs ASU.
[The timing of his targeting penalty was as bad as could be for missed time, right at the start of the second half.]

- Still Perez OR Alfieri at ILB. Guess Barton won't be back. Don't suppose anyone has heard anything there?

- Unless there is a missing "or", then the depth chart lists Smith and Harrington as equal #2s at TE, with Parkinson below them. I don't think that correctly reflects the situation on the field.

- Has anyone noticed the number of snaps for our backup DLs (Swann, Williams, Schaeffer)? I have noticed a fairly high substitution rate at every other defensive position, but close to none on the line.

- Depth charts always used to designate a rotation at nickel back. That is no longer the case, despite the fact that we use the formation often. I think the rotation there is very fluid.

[CTcard]

Depth chart is up - http://www.gostanford.com/documents/2017..._state.pdf

I'll save you a trip.  Starting QB is listed as Chryst OR Costello.

A few other notes,

- At one CB spot this list is Holder OR Murphy.
I am assuming that is because Holder will be out for the first half vs ASU.
[The timing of his targeting penalty was as bad as could be for missed time, right at the start of the second half.]

- Still Perez OR Alfieri at ILB. Guess Barton won't be back. Don't suppose anyone has heard anything there?

- Unless there is a missing "or", then the depth chart lists Smith and Harrington as equal #2s at TE, with Parkinson below them. I don't think that correctly reflects the situation on the field.

- Has anyone noticed the number of snaps for our backup DLs (Swann, Williams, Schaeffer)? I have noticed a fairly high substitution rate at every other defensive position, but close to none on the line.

- Depth charts always used to designate a rotation at nickel back. That is no longer the case, despite the fact that we use the formation often. I think the rotation there is very fluid.