[Goose]

IT WAS A GREAT WIN FOR THE STANFORD TEAM & FANS, NO DOUBT!

In the grander scheme of college football, it wasn't a quality win.  I'm judging through the playoff lens, because this is the context in which "quality win" really means anything, and to what Stanford aspires. 

I highly doubt when UW knocks off Utah, it will be called a quality win, though in UW's case, given how weak its schedule is Utah might be the 3rd best team UW faces during the season.  Utah is probably the 7th-8th best team Stanford plays in the regular season, after UW, WSU, U$C, SDSU, UCLA, and ND, maybe even ASU.

OF, I can more or less agree with all of the above except the last part. I can't agree that Utah is worse than UCLA and ASU. No way. At the moment, UCLA brings very little to the table besides Rosen. That won't be enough.  We will find out Nov. 3 I guess. ND, I really don't know. Georgia, who is legit, beat them. They won ugly against Michigan State, but they won. I won't quibble there. But the other two, I don't buy.

[Goose]

IT WAS A GREAT WIN FOR THE STANFORD TEAM & FANS, NO DOUBT!

In the grander scheme of college football, it wasn't a quality win.  I'm judging through the playoff lens, because this is the context in which "quality win" really means anything, and to what Stanford aspires. 

I highly doubt when UW knocks off Utah, it will be called a quality win, though in UW's case, given how weak its schedule is Utah might be the 3rd best team UW faces during the season.  Utah is probably the 7th-8th best team Stanford plays in the regular season, after UW, WSU, U$C, SDSU, UCLA, and ND, maybe even ASU.

OF, I can more or less agree with all of the above except the last part. I can't agree that Utah is worse than UCLA and ASU. No way. At the moment, UCLA brings very little to the table besides Rosen. That won't be enough.  We will find out Nov. 3 I guess. ND, I really don't know. Georgia, who is legit, beat them. They won ugly against Michigan State, but they won. I won't quibble there. But the other two, I don't buy.