[CardinalSagehen]

[quote author=Cardinal Sagehen link=topic=17684.msg206123#msg206123 date=1507954870]
[quote author=TreesAndBirds link=topic=17684.msg206115#msg206115 date=1507951645]
If we lose to someone like Oregon and beat WSU and UW, then we would want them both to have two or more losses so it might matter, but seems like an unlikely circumstance.

Going 2-0 against UW and WSU seems like a lot to expect this year.  We need one or both them to have other losses, especially against North Division teams.
[/quote]

Doesn't matter if they lose to North or South division teams.

BC
[/quote]

It might matter, in the event of a 3-way tie.  The first tie-breaker is the record amongst the three teams, and all could be 1-1 against each other (e.g., We beat WSU, WSU beats UW, UW beats us).  In that case, the next tie-breaker is the Division record.  But I'll take any conference losses by UW and WSU... not picky!

[CardinalSagehen]

[quote author=Cardinal Sagehen link=topic=17684.msg206123#msg206123 date=1507954870]
[quote author=TreesAndBirds link=topic=17684.msg206115#msg206115 date=1507951645]
If we lose to someone like Oregon and beat WSU and UW, then we would want them both to have two or more losses so it might matter, but seems like an unlikely circumstance.

Going 2-0 against UW and WSU seems like a lot to expect this year.  We need one or both them to have other losses, especially against North Division teams.
[/quote]

Doesn't matter if they lose to North or South division teams.

BC
[/quote]

It might matter, in the event of a 3-way tie.  The first tie-breaker is the record amongst the three teams, and all could be 1-1 against each other (e.g., We beat WSU, WSU beats UW, UW beats us).  In that case, the next tie-breaker is the Division record.  But I'll take any conference losses by UW and WSU... not picky!