[RedShift]

[quote author=RedShift link=topic=17801.msg208634#msg208634 date=1509117602]
Has anyone quantified how Shaw's teams do after byes (or at the beginning of the season) vs. season average on metrics of offensive and defensive efficiencies?

Not a complete answer to your question but, per TeamRankings.net:

Since 2011, Stanford is 9-3 (.750) after a bye versus 70-19 (.789) overall. Against the spread during the same time frame, Stanford is 7-5 (.583) versus 54-34 overall (.614). Note that Stanford is the second-best team against the spread overall since 2011 versus somewhere in the 30s against the spread after the bye. Small sample size on the data-slicing, of course, but perhaps an indicator of underperformance.
[/quote]

Thanks, Washingtonismoney. Looks like that the trend is statistically insignificant.

[RedShift]

[quote author=RedShift link=topic=17801.msg208634#msg208634 date=1509117602]
Has anyone quantified how Shaw's teams do after byes (or at the beginning of the season) vs. season average on metrics of offensive and defensive efficiencies?

Not a complete answer to your question but, per TeamRankings.net:

Since 2011, Stanford is 9-3 (.750) after a bye versus 70-19 (.789) overall. Against the spread during the same time frame, Stanford is 7-5 (.583) versus 54-34 overall (.614). Note that Stanford is the second-best team against the spread overall since 2011 versus somewhere in the 30s against the spread after the bye. Small sample size on the data-slicing, of course, but perhaps an indicator of underperformance.
[/quote]

Thanks, Washingtonismoney. Looks like that the trend is statistically insignificant.