[stupac2]

[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17794.msg208990#msg208990 date=1509244355]
I don’t know why it would be acceptable to run your mouth when you don’t think the target is listening than any more than when you think he would be reading your posts.  If I wanted raving lunatics, I would go to a Notre Dame board.  I’d like to think Stanford fans are better than that, and would show a modicum of respect and class when talking about the soon to be winningest coach in Stanford history.

BC

Yeah, and here we sit. Smarter than all, cause we're better than the unwashed masses. Our class dictates that, right? But then we stoop to calling opposing coaches front butt, purple face, etc. and proudly stick with those cute little auto corrects to bears, literature's most famous losers, Notre Dame and the like. God, I hate condescension. I much prefer lunacy.
[/quote]

Well that's a silly argument, BC doesn't use those names and (IIRC) isn't a fan of the auto-correct.

[stupac2]

[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17794.msg208990#msg208990 date=1509244355]
I don’t know why it would be acceptable to run your mouth when you don’t think the target is listening than any more than when you think he would be reading your posts.  If I wanted raving lunatics, I would go to a Notre Dame board.  I’d like to think Stanford fans are better than that, and would show a modicum of respect and class when talking about the soon to be winningest coach in Stanford history.

BC

Yeah, and here we sit. Smarter than all, cause we're better than the unwashed masses. Our class dictates that, right? But then we stoop to calling opposing coaches front butt, purple face, etc. and proudly stick with those cute little auto corrects to bears, literature's most famous losers, Notre Dame and the like. God, I hate condescension. I much prefer lunacy.
[/quote]

Well that's a silly argument, BC doesn't use those names and (IIRC) isn't a fan of the auto-correct.