10-29-2017, 05:08 PM
(10-29-2017, 04:53 PM)PalmTree link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17817.msg209178#msg209178 date=1509320476]
[quote author=Langdude link=topic=17817.msg209173#msg209173 date=1509318413]
I would like for us to be able to up- or down-vote the following:
1) Individual words, paragraphs, or sentences within posts.
2) Grammatical skill within posts.
3) Our mood at time of posting.
4) Individual players on any Stanford team, current or past (or future, I suppose).
5) The picture/avatar posters use.
6) The epigraph posters use.
7) Tom Hanks (trying to think of the least controversial person in the world).
8) Dinner.
9) The use of up- or down-votes. (We could call this meta-voting.)
10) Lists that do not have ten ideas.
-m.
What about rating Uma Thurman?
BC
[/quote]
....As the French would say in rating difficulty of mountain climbs for bike racing...."Hors Catégorie!"
[/quote]
Oh! I remember that from the Tour de France! I became a fan back in the LeMond years, and then became a bigger fan in the Armstrong years. Stuck with it for a few years after he retired, but it had to go (along with other things) with the advent of children. Anyway, I remember that term being used for some of the stages, e.g., Alpe d'Huez.
-m.
