11-26-2017, 12:52 PM
Wilner also projects the Alamo Bowl slot being filled by U$C if they lose the conference championship game and Washington if we lose the ccg.
http://thecardboard.org/board/Themes/Fle...bc/img.gif
That may be correct (probably is) - for some reason UW is ranked higher than Stanford in both polls right now.
However I would think that with a strong showing vs $C the Alamo should at least consider a Stanford team that just beat two top 10 teams in a row by multiple score margins, one of those teams being the competition for being in this bowl. And the row of cupcakes still stands.
More Wilnerish is that he still lists Stanford possibilities as including the Foster Farms Bowl, even though he doesn't list any possible combination of replacements for Stanford in Alamo/Holiday Bowls.
[That is, if Stanford loses the CCG and falls to the Foster Farms Bowl, Wilner apparently has UW in the Alamo Bowl AND the Holiday Bowl as he lists no other possibilities.]
http://thecardboard.org/board/Themes/Fle...bc/img.gif
That may be correct (probably is) - for some reason UW is ranked higher than Stanford in both polls right now.
However I would think that with a strong showing vs $C the Alamo should at least consider a Stanford team that just beat two top 10 teams in a row by multiple score margins, one of those teams being the competition for being in this bowl. And the row of cupcakes still stands.
More Wilnerish is that he still lists Stanford possibilities as including the Foster Farms Bowl, even though he doesn't list any possible combination of replacements for Stanford in Alamo/Holiday Bowls.
[That is, if Stanford loses the CCG and falls to the Foster Farms Bowl, Wilner apparently has UW in the Alamo Bowl AND the Holiday Bowl as he lists no other possibilities.]