12-02-2017, 10:33 AM
(12-02-2017, 09:03 AM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:turnover luck was a big positive factor for Stanford this year -- maybe a touchdown boost per game. If that regresses to the mean next year, it could get ugly.
I don't know whether the other "softer" factors you mention outweigh the turnovers aspect, but it's hard to ignore that.
I wonder about that. Is there evidence that this year was the outlier or that prior years were the outliers?
Audaces fortuna iuvat
