[teejers1]

Well, CTC, if we're parrying back and forth, will you at least acknowledge that when you put a premium on fewer possessions - which Stanford inexplicably appears to do - that when the D scores or puts the O in a great position to score, that such instances make the O look far better on a PPP basis than it would with a team that actually, you know, likes to have a lot of offensive possessions and plays with a little more pace?

Or is there something there I'm missing (which is entirely possible). 

Another bottom line:  it's a good thing we had otherworldly Bryce Love this year.  He single-handedly made the offense look decent, especially early in the year.

[teejers1]

Well, CTC, if we're parrying back and forth, will you at least acknowledge that when you put a premium on fewer possessions - which Stanford inexplicably appears to do - that when the D scores or puts the O in a great position to score, that such instances make the O look far better on a PPP basis than it would with a team that actually, you know, likes to have a lot of offensive possessions and plays with a little more pace?

Or is there something there I'm missing (which is entirely possible). 

Another bottom line:  it's a good thing we had otherworldly Bryce Love this year.  He single-handedly made the offense look decent, especially early in the year.