12-30-2017, 11:27 AM
Yes. The d-line and probably OLB definitely tired in the second half. I don't remember hearing Mike Tyler's name once. Part of that was our lack of depth not enabling us to sub. Part of that was our offense a couple of times being too brief. And part of that was us not stopping TCU. I agree with you that it is not merely a TOP argument full stop.
-m.
By over six minutes. Guess that facts get in the way of some of the above arguments. Good catch Langdude.
Stanford won the turnover battle, as well. 3-2.
[/quote]
[/quote]
-m.
(12-30-2017, 11:07 AM)lex24 link Wrote:Second half:Â
TCU. 9-75. TD
S. 4-79. TD
TCU. 9-75. TD
S. 7-64. FG
TCU. 3-17. Fun
S. 3-0. Punt
TCU. 1-95 TD
S 3 minus 15. Punt. TCU TD
S. 10-76. TD
TCU. 9-59. FG
Then the three and out. The announcers were talking about Stanford being gassed defensively. Those long drives are killers. TOP is impacted by tempo. Its not just the TOP. Its the plays.
[quote author=cardcrimson link=topic=18453.msg219727#msg219727 date=1514570163]
[quote author=Langdude link=topic=18453.msg219725#msg219725 date=1514569860]
We did possess the ball more than TCU.
-m.
By over six minutes. Guess that facts get in the way of some of the above arguments. Good catch Langdude.
Stanford won the turnover battle, as well. 3-2.
[/quote]
[/quote]