[teejers1]

CI, I'll refrain from another rant because (i) McGrath vouches for you, and (ii) you support the program with 2 precious resources - your time and money (unlike many folks here who, as far as I can tell, support the program with their mouths/finger strokes only).  I'll only say this:  if you see Stanford's O line up with one player in standard WR spot - and that person is a TE - don't you feel pretty confident/absolutely sure that Stanford is about to run the ball?  I mean, it doesn't take a high school or college football coach to figure this out.  And I don't care who cites which "advanced metrics" - it doesn't change the fact that the kind of play is telegraphed and that it's generally easier to defend a run when you know a run is coming.  I mean . . . c'mon.

But I'm as tired of this debate as everyone else, so I'll move onto something more "positive."  Went to Maples tonight to support the hoops team and what a great game against Cal. 

Oh, wait . . .

[teejers1]

CI, I'll refrain from another rant because (i) McGrath vouches for you, and (ii) you support the program with 2 precious resources - your time and money (unlike many folks here who, as far as I can tell, support the program with their mouths/finger strokes only).  I'll only say this:  if you see Stanford's O line up with one player in standard WR spot - and that person is a TE - don't you feel pretty confident/absolutely sure that Stanford is about to run the ball?  I mean, it doesn't take a high school or college football coach to figure this out.  And I don't care who cites which "advanced metrics" - it doesn't change the fact that the kind of play is telegraphed and that it's generally easier to defend a run when you know a run is coming.  I mean . . . c'mon.

But I'm as tired of this debate as everyone else, so I'll move onto something more "positive."  Went to Maples tonight to support the hoops team and what a great game against Cal. 

Oh, wait . . .