[stupac2]

Can you people just copulating stop it with this inanity? People don't disagree with you because they're so in love with Shaw or whatever asinine fantasy you've concocted in your fervid imagination, it's because your arguments are bad. If you actually read what people are saying you'll find that there is no one, literally no one, defending Shaw on all fronts. Which is as it should be, no one is immune from criticism. But the fact that the current administration is imperfect doesn't mean that they do nothing right, and it doesn't mean that whatever you think they do wrong is clearly wrong and everyone who disagrees is just a dumb homer. It's ridiculous.

Ok, here's what you've accused all questioners of Shawism:

They are inane
They are asinine
They are fanciful
They have bad arguments
They think all Shawists defend him on all fronts
They think the football program does nothing right
They think that whatever they thinks clearly correct
They think that anyone who disagrees with them is a dumb homer

I haven't seen any posts from skeptical Stanford fans that contain any of these elements

No, I was accusing you of those things. As I said, literally everyone on this board has problems with something or other that Shaw does, but you just said everyone who doesn't completely agree with you ignores whatever the "eye" and "smell" tests are, as though what you perceive is some kind of revealed truth.

(unlike many folks here who, as far as I can tell, support the program with their mouths/finger strokes only).

Wow.

[stupac2]

Can you people just copulating stop it with this inanity? People don't disagree with you because they're so in love with Shaw or whatever asinine fantasy you've concocted in your fervid imagination, it's because your arguments are bad. If you actually read what people are saying you'll find that there is no one, literally no one, defending Shaw on all fronts. Which is as it should be, no one is immune from criticism. But the fact that the current administration is imperfect doesn't mean that they do nothing right, and it doesn't mean that whatever you think they do wrong is clearly wrong and everyone who disagrees is just a dumb homer. It's ridiculous.

Ok, here's what you've accused all questioners of Shawism:

They are inane
They are asinine
They are fanciful
They have bad arguments
They think all Shawists defend him on all fronts
They think the football program does nothing right
They think that whatever they thinks clearly correct
They think that anyone who disagrees with them is a dumb homer

I haven't seen any posts from skeptical Stanford fans that contain any of these elements

No, I was accusing you of those things. As I said, literally everyone on this board has problems with something or other that Shaw does, but you just said everyone who doesn't completely agree with you ignores whatever the "eye" and "smell" tests are, as though what you perceive is some kind of revealed truth.

(unlike many folks here who, as far as I can tell, support the program with their mouths/finger strokes only).

Wow.