[stupac2]

[quote author=stupac2 link=topic=18454.msg219876#msg219876 date=1514679946]
[quote author=phxfan link=topic=18454.msg219872#msg219872 date=1514678104]I thank you for your honesty fan.  There are many here so emotionally or otherwise invested in David Shaw that they ignore things like the smell test and eyeball test.

Can you people just copulating stop it with this inanity? People don't disagree with you because they're so in love with Shaw or whatever asinine fantasy you've concocted in your fervid imagination, it's because your arguments are bad. If you actually read what people are saying you'll find that there is no one, literally no one, defending Shaw on all fronts. Which is as it should be, no one is immune from criticism. But the fact that the current administration is imperfect doesn't mean that they do nothing right, and it doesn't mean that whatever you think they do wrong is clearly wrong and everyone who disagrees is just a dumb homer. It's ridiculous.
[/quote]

Even more ridiculous is that you can't prove a single poster on the opposite side of your argument has done anything like what you describe.  Your self-righteousness in this regard is quite pronounced.  Just in the past 48 hours I've read you and your fellow travelers falling prey to double dealing, false equivalency and circular reasoning.  I'd be happy to know where you think Shaw and Pritchard fall nationally among offensive practitioners.  Top quarter, top half?
[/quote]

You did it in the post I quoted! Or are you going to say that "There are many here so emotionally or otherwise invested in David Shaw that they ignore things like the smell test and eyeball test" doesn't mean what it literally says? This has to be one of the most precious replies I've ever seen on any messageboard.

[stupac2]

[quote author=stupac2 link=topic=18454.msg219876#msg219876 date=1514679946]
[quote author=phxfan link=topic=18454.msg219872#msg219872 date=1514678104]I thank you for your honesty fan.  There are many here so emotionally or otherwise invested in David Shaw that they ignore things like the smell test and eyeball test.

Can you people just copulating stop it with this inanity? People don't disagree with you because they're so in love with Shaw or whatever asinine fantasy you've concocted in your fervid imagination, it's because your arguments are bad. If you actually read what people are saying you'll find that there is no one, literally no one, defending Shaw on all fronts. Which is as it should be, no one is immune from criticism. But the fact that the current administration is imperfect doesn't mean that they do nothing right, and it doesn't mean that whatever you think they do wrong is clearly wrong and everyone who disagrees is just a dumb homer. It's ridiculous.
[/quote]

Even more ridiculous is that you can't prove a single poster on the opposite side of your argument has done anything like what you describe.  Your self-righteousness in this regard is quite pronounced.  Just in the past 48 hours I've read you and your fellow travelers falling prey to double dealing, false equivalency and circular reasoning.  I'd be happy to know where you think Shaw and Pritchard fall nationally among offensive practitioners.  Top quarter, top half?
[/quote]

You did it in the post I quoted! Or are you going to say that "There are many here so emotionally or otherwise invested in David Shaw that they ignore things like the smell test and eyeball test" doesn't mean what it literally says? This has to be one of the most precious replies I've ever seen on any messageboard.