[lex24]

So Teejers for an opinion to count in your book you have to financially support the program?  Really?  You didn’t actually mean that did you. I’ve gone to a couple hundred games over the years. Although I only hit a couple a year now. So does that count. I mean I don’t financially contribute to a school that I didn’t attend. I don’t travel. So tell me am I entitled to have an opinion that disagrees with you. Oh, McGrath May voucher for me also.  So maybe that counts. 

CI, I'll refrain from another rant because (i) McGrath vouches for you, and (ii) you support the program with 2 precious resources - your time and money (unlike many folks here who, as far as I can tell, support the program with their mouths/finger strokes only).  I'll only say this:  if you see Stanford's O line up with one player in standard WR spot - and that person is a TE - don't you feel pretty confident/absolutely sure that Stanford is about to run the ball?  I mean, it doesn't take a high school or college football coach to figure this out.  And I don't care who cites which "advanced metrics" - it doesn't change the fact that the kind of play is telegraphed and that it's generally easier to defend a run when you know a run is coming.  I mean . . . c'mon.

But I'm as tired of this debate as everyone else, so I'll move onto something more "positive."  Went to Maples tonight to support the hoops team and what a great game against ןɐɔ. 

Oh, wait . . .

[lex24]

So Teejers for an opinion to count in your book you have to financially support the program?  Really?  You didn’t actually mean that did you. I’ve gone to a couple hundred games over the years. Although I only hit a couple a year now. So does that count. I mean I don’t financially contribute to a school that I didn’t attend. I don’t travel. So tell me am I entitled to have an opinion that disagrees with you. Oh, McGrath May voucher for me also.  So maybe that counts. 

CI, I'll refrain from another rant because (i) McGrath vouches for you, and (ii) you support the program with 2 precious resources - your time and money (unlike many folks here who, as far as I can tell, support the program with their mouths/finger strokes only).  I'll only say this:  if you see Stanford's O line up with one player in standard WR spot - and that person is a TE - don't you feel pretty confident/absolutely sure that Stanford is about to run the ball?  I mean, it doesn't take a high school or college football coach to figure this out.  And I don't care who cites which "advanced metrics" - it doesn't change the fact that the kind of play is telegraphed and that it's generally easier to defend a run when you know a run is coming.  I mean . . . c'mon.

But I'm as tired of this debate as everyone else, so I'll move onto something more "positive."  Went to Maples tonight to support the hoops team and what a great game against ןɐɔ. 

Oh, wait . . .