[BostonCard]

Anyway, don't be so defensive. To the extent that post was on the topic of your bete noir, it was promoting the ideas that a) Stanford does tend to tip its plays by formation, and b) there may be a systematic issue with the first down passing game - ideas that would seem to align with your predilections.

Well, given that Teejers is agitating for fewer runs between the tackles, I suspect that suggestions that passing on first down is not working very well would not align all that well with his predilection for more passing on first down, at least assuming that Teejers is agitating for more passing as a means to an end and not an end in itself (sometimes I wonder about that).

BC

[BostonCard]

Anyway, don't be so defensive. To the extent that post was on the topic of your bete noir, it was promoting the ideas that a) Stanford does tend to tip its plays by formation, and b) there may be a systematic issue with the first down passing game - ideas that would seem to align with your predilections.

Well, given that Teejers is agitating for fewer runs between the tackles, I suspect that suggestions that passing on first down is not working very well would not align all that well with his predilection for more passing on first down, at least assuming that Teejers is agitating for more passing as a means to an end and not an end in itself (sometimes I wonder about that).

BC