01-11-2012, 01:08 PM
8 regular season win teams usually end up just at the edge of the top 25, so that seems reasonable.
Most analysts believed Auburn was Cam Newton, and yet without Cam the team will still at the edge of the Top 25 despite playing in the all mighty SEC.
Stanford without Andrew probably can get to at least a similar place. I think the pieces around Andrew are more able to thrive without him AND Stanford competes in the less ruthless Pac-12.
Most analysts believed Auburn was Cam Newton, and yet without Cam the team will still at the edge of the Top 25 despite playing in the all mighty SEC.
Stanford without Andrew probably can get to at least a similar place. I think the pieces around Andrew are more able to thrive without him AND Stanford competes in the less ruthless Pac-12.