(05-28-2019, 02:32 PM)Canalejas Wrote: Regions sorted by average Massey Rating
I like the table a lot. Gives a great overview of the different regionals.
That is Massey's own computer power ranking, not the Massey composite (not that you said anything different, just for clarification). I started doing a similar table with Boyd Nation's ISR, but it was similar enough that it wasn't worth the effort.
It's worth looking at the same table based upon RPI. I think that will tell us something about how the committee went about their business.
Host 1 seed 2 seed 3 seed 4 seed Average
Stanford 10 21 34 117 45.5
Oregon St 20 23 39 96 44.5
Mississippi 22 28 38 78 41.5
Georgia 3 37 50 107 49.25
Vanderbilt 1 24 86 126 59.25
Ok State 7 29 35 100 42.75
Texas Tech 11 25 27 150 53.25
N Carolina 12 14 40 147 53.25
LSU 16 33 45 138 58.0
W Virginia 13 15 44 135 51.75
Arkansas 6 30 59 184 69.75
UCLA 2 32 77 198 77.25
Louisville 9 36 26 187 64.5
Miss State 4 17 73 206 75.0
E Carolina 5 18 56 177 64.0
Ga Tech 7 19 57 235 79.5
For the most part, you can see that the committee built the field on the RPI.
Among the 1 seeds, OSU and Mississippi have been heavily discussed as the two hosts who were promoted vs their RPI.
Among 2 seeds, the only teams notably promoted above their RPI ranks were Florida Atlantic in the Georgia region and Indiana in the Louisville regional. The latter is part of the one odd swap, as the committee penalized the third seed in the Louisville regional, Illinois State, vs their RPI to the point where Indiana and Illinois State would appear to be swapped as seeds. While the non-RPI computer rankings don't think the two were swapped, I don't know enough about midwest baseball to know what the committee was thinking there.
At the other end of the 3 seeds, vs 4 seeds, there's a single minor swap but pretty much true to RPI.

![[Image: grXlkEy.png]](https://i.imgur.com/grXlkEy.png)