10-05-2019, 11:07 AM
(10-05-2019, 09:27 AM)Mick Wrote:(10-04-2019, 03:03 PM)cardcrimson Wrote:(10-04-2019, 02:31 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote: The term "student athlete" was invented by the NCAA to make exploiting athletes sound more palpable.
I'm curious, I wonder how many "student athletes" believe they were truly exploited.
FWIW, I really hope a top tier university exploits my daughter with a full ride scholarship.
It isn't just the scholarship, it's the admissions acceptance from schools ordinarily considered to difficult to gain admission. When my son was in 8th grade, I contacted the following selective to highly selective universities, all of which had men's volleyball programs: Harvard, Stanford, Princeton, MIT, UC-Berkeley, UCLA, USC, UC-San Diego, NYU, UC-Santa Barbara, UC-Irvine, UC-Santa Cruz. 11 of the 12 coaches responded to my e-mails. Athletics helps a student gain admission, which, for the 99.99% who won't make their living in athletics, is particularly important. What parent wouldn't want their child to attend a school that is a standard deviation better than they might otherwise expect?
Indeed. It seems to me that this sixteen (and counting)-page thread on rich parents trying to transform their children into "student athletes" for admissions purposes is suggestive of the fact that being a student-athlete applicant is a privilege so valuable some were willing to pay millions of dollars to have it bestowed upon them...
