10-27-2019, 02:22 PM
(10-27-2019, 10:53 AM)lex24 Wrote: :).
(10-27-2019, 10:35 AM)cardcrimson Wrote:(10-27-2019, 10:29 AM)lex24 Wrote: So, I truly tried to create a discussion on players. Not coaching. Guess that’s impossible.Was completely commenting on the quoted post, not the thread.
(10-27-2019, 10:26 AM)cardcrimson Wrote:(10-27-2019, 10:18 AM)jonnyss Wrote: and he has to get some of the credit for calling plays that the 3 freshmen o-linemen know how to block.
Well, two out of three games ain't bad. Or is that 1/3 empty.
That said, disagree, with the original post. Much more than a "Nice win". IMHO.
I suspect 6-6 will get them somewhere. The main benefit of which will be extra practices for what is a very young team. Cal if they don’t get Garbers back is toast. WSU hard to forecast. I suspect Stanford‘s going to have to score a lot of points to win that game Haven’t seen enough of Colorado to make an intelligent comment – although that usually doesn’t stop me! And while it was heartwarming to see Notre Dame get the ever loving snot knocked out of it, that is going to be at best an uphill battle.
(10-27-2019, 10:43 AM)qwerty49 Wrote:(10-26-2019, 08:11 PM)winflop Wrote: Hot Take: I am looking forward to seeing Stanford win Big Game to become bowl eligible while eliminating the Weenies from bowl eligibility.
The road to a bowl goes through Wazzu. They, we, and Cal are all 4-4 and we all play each other.
". . . Haven’t seen enough of Colorado to make an intelligent comment – although that usually doesn’t stop me! . . . "
Well, SOMETHING must be stopping you. HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!
JK. I just liked the play on words. :-)
"It's not what you don't know that gets you in trouble. It's what you think you know that just isn't so."
Mark Twain
