[Goose]

Sure why not. Given that I had given up on Stratford seeing the field in a Stanford uniform, if he can contribute on D, that would be a positive.

On TE, I suppose a lot depends on what happens with Párkinson next year.  If he’s back, agree on moving Fisk to defense.  Cotton made the move. It wasn’t an overwhelming success, but he added depth at a position of need.  But if Párkinson leaves, it’s not like we have a ton of depth at TE; Harrington, Archer and the frosh coming in, none of them proven.

BC

I think it probably depends a lot on what Fisk wants to do. For some reason, I have the impression he prefers offense, but I don't have anything to back it up.

[Goose]

Sure why not. Given that I had given up on Stratford seeing the field in a Stanford uniform, if he can contribute on D, that would be a positive.

On TE, I suppose a lot depends on what happens with Párkinson next year.  If he’s back, agree on moving Fisk to defense.  Cotton made the move. It wasn’t an overwhelming success, but he added depth at a position of need.  But if Párkinson leaves, it’s not like we have a ton of depth at TE; Harrington, Archer and the frosh coming in, none of them proven.

BC

I think it probably depends a lot on what Fisk wants to do. For some reason, I have the impression he prefers offense, but I don't have anything to back it up.