[BostonCard]

Well, the USPTO determined that artificial intelligences could not own patents, though I don't think this has been settled.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/can-an-ai-s...1570801500

In August, the U.S. patent office sent a letter stating that the applications wouldn’t be considered unless the applicants listed the inventors involved by their legal names. Later that month, Dr. Abbott and his team filed a response requesting that the office recognize Dabus as the inventor because there was no human inventor. It also asked that Mr. Thaler be granted ownership rights to the inventions.

BC

[BostonCard]

Well, the USPTO determined that artificial intelligences could not own patents, though I don't think this has been settled.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/can-an-ai-s...1570801500

In August, the U.S. patent office sent a letter stating that the applications wouldn’t be considered unless the applicants listed the inventors involved by their legal names. Later that month, Dr. Abbott and his team filed a response requesting that the office recognize Dabus as the inventor because there was no human inventor. It also asked that Mr. Thaler be granted ownership rights to the inventions.

BC