[washingtonismoney]

That said I'm not too troubled with the UW loss. My impression is that they've stocked some big bodies over the last couple of years and will get serviceable replacements.

I don't think that's correct. UW surrendered 34 sacks last year, 11th in the conference, and 78 TFL, 9th in the conference. Overall I'm sure they'll have a good offense--too many weapons not to--but losing two starters total (this guy to injury; another to eligibility) from a poor offensive line isn't a recipe for success. Overall, their OL recruiting is only so-so--about three four-star recruits over their entire roster. Compares poorly to the rest of the conference, generally speaking.

[washingtonismoney]

That said I'm not too troubled with the UW loss. My impression is that they've stocked some big bodies over the last couple of years and will get serviceable replacements.

I don't think that's correct. UW surrendered 34 sacks last year, 11th in the conference, and 78 TFL, 9th in the conference. Overall I'm sure they'll have a good offense--too many weapons not to--but losing two starters total (this guy to injury; another to eligibility) from a poor offensive line isn't a recipe for success. Overall, their OL recruiting is only so-so--about three four-star recruits over their entire roster. Compares poorly to the rest of the conference, generally speaking.