[washingtonismoney]

Nice find!  I wonder if we will recruit young(er) Shuler.  It is a long way to signing day, with the hurdles of admissions still to surmount for everyone committed right now, as well as other temptations for them along the way.  Probably a good idea to have at least one other talented QB in the wings.  But the small size of this class is going to make for some tough decisions by the coaches.

If we can trust the recruiting sites, it looks like the coaches are trying to put together a stellar LB class, much as they addressed primarily the OL and DL last cycle.  How much room is there in the rest of this class for RB (only two that I can see we have offered), TE (struck out so far), DB (narrow miss on Hawkins), WR (Owusu?). 

I'm clearly way too obessed with the whole process.

It's not a younger Shuler--the "brother" is figurative. Staver is just visiting us sometime in the summer...I'd be highly surprised if we took a second QB in the class--it's small, and you could make an argument that zero is a better number than two for the proper number of QBs to take in this class, whatever size it ends up being.

LBs are a focus because we need them, and like class of 2012 OL, there are many with good grades. So that's a priority.  We can get by with zero RBs if we want, so as with Barry J. Sanders, we'll only take one if we think he's really good. TE is a must-get. WRs and DBs there are some good ones floating around and obviously we'll take them, but I don't think they're a priority in the same way TE and LB should be.

[washingtonismoney]

Nice find!  I wonder if we will recruit young(er) Shuler.  It is a long way to signing day, with the hurdles of admissions still to surmount for everyone committed right now, as well as other temptations for them along the way.  Probably a good idea to have at least one other talented QB in the wings.  But the small size of this class is going to make for some tough decisions by the coaches.

If we can trust the recruiting sites, it looks like the coaches are trying to put together a stellar LB class, much as they addressed primarily the OL and DL last cycle.  How much room is there in the rest of this class for RB (only two that I can see we have offered), TE (struck out so far), DB (narrow miss on Hawkins), WR (Owusu?). 

I'm clearly way too obessed with the whole process.

It's not a younger Shuler--the "brother" is figurative. Staver is just visiting us sometime in the summer...I'd be highly surprised if we took a second QB in the class--it's small, and you could make an argument that zero is a better number than two for the proper number of QBs to take in this class, whatever size it ends up being.

LBs are a focus because we need them, and like class of 2012 OL, there are many with good grades. So that's a priority.  We can get by with zero RBs if we want, so as with Barry J. Sanders, we'll only take one if we think he's really good. TE is a must-get. WRs and DBs there are some good ones floating around and obviously we'll take them, but I don't think they're a priority in the same way TE and LB should be.