[Redrum]

Condition A:  Texas is "interested in"  Player A.  Step 1: It evaluates his tape and  Step 2: Coaches attend his games.  Step 3: They invite him to UT football camp and  at one of Step 1, 2 or 3 offers him.  Then spends time wooing him and, when he commits, making sure he doesn't wander off the ranch. 

Condtion B:  Texas is "interested in" Player B.  Enough to evaluate on tape,  maybe even invite him to camp for a closer look... but doesn't offer for whatever reason and moves on to players that fit Condition A. 

Which condition or player -- in the context of recruiting wars-- best fits the definition of "interested in"?  You could argue that Player B is actually a "Texas reject",  (not that it matters if he can contribute to Stanford.)

So, what Texas player that fits Condition A at  UT Austin has Stanford ever ended up taking from Mack Brown?

[Redrum]

Condition A:  Texas is "interested in"  Player A.  Step 1: It evaluates his tape and  Step 2: Coaches attend his games.  Step 3: They invite him to UT football camp and  at one of Step 1, 2 or 3 offers him.  Then spends time wooing him and, when he commits, making sure he doesn't wander off the ranch. 

Condtion B:  Texas is "interested in" Player B.  Enough to evaluate on tape,  maybe even invite him to camp for a closer look... but doesn't offer for whatever reason and moves on to players that fit Condition A. 

Which condition or player -- in the context of recruiting wars-- best fits the definition of "interested in"?  You could argue that Player B is actually a "Texas reject",  (not that it matters if he can contribute to Stanford.)

So, what Texas player that fits Condition A at  UT Austin has Stanford ever ended up taking from Mack Brown?