[OutsiderFan]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/20...etes-paid/

I think this was inevitable given various state laws coming into force (triggered by California's), and the message that the US Supreme Court's recent ruling on educational benefits sent.  No, the decision had nothing to do with NIL rules, but the unanimous ruling sent a very strong signal that the NCAA was going to be challenged on amateurism rules.

BC

While opening NIL activities to student-athletes, the policy leaves in place the commitment to avoid pay-for-play and improper inducements tied to choosing to attend a particular school. Those prohibitions would remain in effect.

The towering ignorance of the above NCAA statement is truly impressive to behold.

[OutsiderFan]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/20...etes-paid/

I think this was inevitable given various state laws coming into force (triggered by California's), and the message that the US Supreme Court's recent ruling on educational benefits sent.  No, the decision had nothing to do with NIL rules, but the unanimous ruling sent a very strong signal that the NCAA was going to be challenged on amateurism rules.

BC

While opening NIL activities to student-athletes, the policy leaves in place the commitment to avoid pay-for-play and improper inducements tied to choosing to attend a particular school. Those prohibitions would remain in effect.

The towering ignorance of the above NCAA statement is truly impressive to behold.