10-11-2021, 03:23 PM
(10-11-2021, 03:09 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(10-11-2021, 12:16 PM)teejers1 Wrote: Yeah, I do not consider tossing jump balls to tall WRs to be a "big play" offense.
Stanford is third in the conference in plays from scrimmage of 20+ yards. We are tied for second in the conference in plays from scrimmage of 50+ yards. We are also the only team in the conference to have a play of longer than 80 yards (but I don't remember what the play was; as I recall, the Peat long run was 75 yards, since it was right after a kick-off).
Considering that we run fewer plays per game than anyone else in the conference bar Colorado, big plays are a disproportionate part of our offense. I think the problem is not the lack of big plays, but the lack of plays good for 5-10 yards, that are important to sustain drives.
BC
PS... thanks to slide for reminding me that I was thinking of the wrong counter to a DB jumping the slant; it would not be a post route, but rather a Go route (what I was actually thinking) or a flag route (what slide suggested).
Troy made this point in his podcast. There were a lot of big plays in the game. But Stanford had trouble sustaining and finishing drives because of the lack of little plays.
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
