[JohnR34231]

You only need to go back to 2004 to 2006 for a worse three year stretch.

10-24 (.294), 7-18 (.280) in conference, 0-3 against Cal.

But, as mentioned, if you are trying to find our historic nadir, then 58-60 was worse than the Buddy/Wlat years.

BC

Tell me, BC, in your 2004 to 2006 "worse three-year stretch," did Stanford ever have four games where:

in the first halves of the games, Stanford averaged 77.5 yards of offense and was outscored 90-3?

That was the last 4 games of THIS season.  That is getting BLOWN OUT in embarrassing, ridiculous "we don't even belong on the same field" fashion.  That is what Coach Shaw has wrought with his stewardship of the program.



I was a STH for the Dark Times you highlight above.  It was bad.  But I don't recall anything as bad as what we've seen this season.  

Do you?

Well, in Wlat's last year (2006) we had a five game stretch where we were outscored 162-20.
I'd say that was at least as bad as what we have seen this season.

[JohnR34231]

You only need to go back to 2004 to 2006 for a worse three year stretch.

10-24 (.294), 7-18 (.280) in conference, 0-3 against Cal.

But, as mentioned, if you are trying to find our historic nadir, then 58-60 was worse than the Buddy/Wlat years.

BC

Tell me, BC, in your 2004 to 2006 "worse three-year stretch," did Stanford ever have four games where:

in the first halves of the games, Stanford averaged 77.5 yards of offense and was outscored 90-3?

That was the last 4 games of THIS season.  That is getting BLOWN OUT in embarrassing, ridiculous "we don't even belong on the same field" fashion.  That is what Coach Shaw has wrought with his stewardship of the program.



I was a STH for the Dark Times you highlight above.  It was bad.  But I don't recall anything as bad as what we've seen this season.  

Do you?

Well, in Wlat's last year (2006) we had a five game stretch where we were outscored 162-20.
I'd say that was at least as bad as what we have seen this season.