[unclechuck]

But then a study like this comes out: "There's troubling new evidence that common pesticides persisting on foods are undermining physical and mental health. The surprising part is that problems occur at doses everyone thought were safe."

http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/...lth-attack

FM - studies like these, as blithely interpreted and extrapolated upon as they are in non peer reviewed journals magazines like Psychology Today, are why it's valuable to have studies like the Stanford one. You might recall as a cautionary tale all the buzz in the 90s-2000s about pesticides and/or xenoestrogens being the cause of global amphibian die offs that turned out to be caused by an aquatic fungus.

Some folks want to write the next Silent Spring as badly as others want to write the next All the Presidents Men, hence, my comment above Re folks choosing to see what they want to see.

[unclechuck]

But then a study like this comes out: "There's troubling new evidence that common pesticides persisting on foods are undermining physical and mental health. The surprising part is that problems occur at doses everyone thought were safe."

http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/...lth-attack

FM - studies like these, as blithely interpreted and extrapolated upon as they are in non peer reviewed journals magazines like Psychology Today, are why it's valuable to have studies like the Stanford one. You might recall as a cautionary tale all the buzz in the 90s-2000s about pesticides and/or xenoestrogens being the cause of global amphibian die offs that turned out to be caused by an aquatic fungus.

Some folks want to write the next Silent Spring as badly as others want to write the next All the Presidents Men, hence, my comment above Re folks choosing to see what they want to see.