[TrumpCard]

Our horrific DL "depth" forced the need to bulk up that much. Remember the pathetic safety situation a couple years ago? That's been happening at DL now, and will continue to for the next 1-2 years because apparently just 1 per class for 3 straight classes was enough. Morons.

My only nit here is that we can't very well simultaneously say: (1) load up on recruits because no one stays longer than 4 years anymore and you can't count on good players staying beyond 3 years anymore; and (2) the DL is going to suck in 2023 because all the DLs are too young, even though the 2021 and 2022 classes each had 3 DLs (plus a strong group of OLB pass rushers, one or more of whom might grow into a DL).  But I agree that the DL numbers have been way too thin for a while.

[TrumpCard]

Our horrific DL "depth" forced the need to bulk up that much. Remember the pathetic safety situation a couple years ago? That's been happening at DL now, and will continue to for the next 1-2 years because apparently just 1 per class for 3 straight classes was enough. Morons.

My only nit here is that we can't very well simultaneously say: (1) load up on recruits because no one stays longer than 4 years anymore and you can't count on good players staying beyond 3 years anymore; and (2) the DL is going to suck in 2023 because all the DLs are too young, even though the 2021 and 2022 classes each had 3 DLs (plus a strong group of OLB pass rushers, one or more of whom might grow into a DL).  But I agree that the DL numbers have been way too thin for a while.