Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident

Hello There, Guest! Welcome to The CardBoard!

Feel free to Register and discuss on various topics with likeminded people. Already have an account? Please Login!

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident

cardcrimson
Senator

Posts: 4,965
Threads: 279
Joined: Feb 2014

#10

04-28-2022, 11:45 AM

“For me personally, I think I’ve earned a little leeway to make the decisions for myself and for the program that I’m in charge of. … I like the place that we’re in now.”

Really dislike this statement. Reeks of everything he's accused of being. . . .

Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.

#10

cardcrimson

04-28-2022, 11:45 AM

“For me personally, I think I’ve earned a little leeway to make the decisions for myself and for the program that I’m in charge of. … I like the place that we’re in now.”

Really dislike this statement. Reeks of everything he's accused of being. . . .

Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by 82lsju - 04-28-2022, 08:14 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Phogge - 04-28-2022, 08:36 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by fullmetal - 04-28-2022, 08:42 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Phogge - 04-28-2022, 08:52 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by JohnR34231 - 04-28-2022, 09:35 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by OutsiderFan - 04-28-2022, 09:36 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Phogge - 04-28-2022, 10:02 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by JohnR34231 - 04-28-2022, 10:10 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Phogge - 04-28-2022, 11:23 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by 82lsju - 04-28-2022, 12:29 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by JustAnotherFan - 04-29-2022, 03:57 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by cardcrimson - 04-28-2022, 11:45 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Spiny_Norman - 04-28-2022, 12:42 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by 82lsju - 04-28-2022, 03:39 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Maple Leaf - 04-28-2022, 03:53 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by SamuelMcF - 04-28-2022, 04:11 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Goose - 04-28-2022, 04:17 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by TrumpCard - 04-28-2022, 06:00 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Goose - 04-28-2022, 06:35 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by cardcrimson - 04-28-2022, 07:02 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by OutsiderFan - 04-29-2022, 05:12 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by TrumpCard - 04-28-2022, 12:56 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by needle - 04-28-2022, 01:51 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by PalmTree - 04-28-2022, 02:01 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by OutsiderFan - 04-28-2022, 02:02 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by rogpodge - 04-28-2022, 02:55 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Goose - 04-29-2022, 01:49 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Phogge - 04-28-2022, 02:22 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by gailtate - 04-28-2022, 03:47 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by 82lsju - 04-28-2022, 03:54 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by dabigv13 - 04-28-2022, 10:45 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Brickcity - 04-28-2022, 10:59 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by BostonCard - 04-28-2022, 11:29 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Brickcity - 04-28-2022, 11:48 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Phogge - 04-28-2022, 04:19 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by BostonCard - 04-28-2022, 10:14 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by dabigv13 - 04-28-2022, 11:21 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by BostonCard - 04-28-2022, 11:57 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by JohnR34231 - 04-29-2022, 05:13 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by OutsiderFan - 04-29-2022, 05:16 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by JohnR34231 - 04-29-2022, 05:20 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by OutsiderFan - 04-29-2022, 05:40 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by 2006alum - 04-29-2022, 06:07 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by OutsiderFan - 04-29-2022, 06:54 AM

lex24 - by lex24 - 04-29-2022, 07:07 AM

RE: lex24 - by 82lsju - 04-29-2022, 07:23 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Goose - 04-29-2022, 10:46 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by 2006alum - 04-29-2022, 07:36 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by fullmetal - 04-29-2022, 07:37 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by OutsiderFan - 04-29-2022, 09:00 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by SamuelMcF - 04-29-2022, 09:57 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by msqueri - 04-29-2022, 10:02 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by OutsiderFan - 04-29-2022, 11:39 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by SamuelMcF - 04-29-2022, 01:40 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by BostonCard - 04-30-2022, 12:02 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by SamuelMcF - 04-30-2022, 11:35 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by winflop - 04-29-2022, 12:36 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by gailtate - 04-29-2022, 02:11 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Brickcity - 04-29-2022, 02:18 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Maple Leaf - 04-29-2022, 02:31 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Goose - 04-29-2022, 02:43 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by msqueri - 04-29-2022, 07:45 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by cardcrimson - 04-29-2022, 09:03 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by JohnR34231 - 04-29-2022, 09:14 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Phogge - 04-29-2022, 08:21 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by msqueri - 04-29-2022, 09:42 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by lex24 - 04-29-2022, 10:09 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by Phogge - 04-29-2022, 10:05 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by fullmetal - 04-29-2022, 10:24 AM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by msqueri - 04-29-2022, 11:03 AM

lex24 - by lex24 - 04-29-2022, 11:47 AM

RE: lex24 - by winflop - 04-29-2022, 01:18 PM

RE: Stanford football under David Shaw is a model of stability, but has it lost its ident - by fullmetal - 04-29-2022, 10:54 PM

View a Printable Version