04-29-2022, 05:40 AM
(04-29-2022, 05:20 AM)JohnR34231 Wrote:(04-29-2022, 05:16 AM)OutsiderFan Wrote:(04-29-2022, 05:13 AM)JohnR34231 Wrote:(04-28-2022, 11:57 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Just out of curiosity, is the statute of limitations for Harbaugh’s influence coincidentally 8 years?
One can not like how the last three years have gone under Shaw, without denigrating his many accomplishments even after all of Harbaugh’s recruits had graduated.
BC
The statute of limitations on Harbaugh is whatever the poster decides it should be to help him make his point that Shaw basically sucks.
There is no statute of limitations necessary to demonstrate Shaw is no longer capable of winning the North division of the Pac-12.
Oh, OK. Now that we have that settled.......
Ah, I see we have identified David Shaw's burner account.
Seriously, this is the CardBoard. You don't get to make claims without bringing receipts to back them up. So let's see them, shall we? Make your case for why David Shaw will return Stanford Football to even 2nd place in the Pac-12 North. I would have thought the evidence to the contrary would be convincing enough, but maybe the majority of us are just not seeing it?