(10-03-2022, 12:56 PM)msqueri Wrote: Actually, while I think we can/should shoot higher, there would be crazier things than trying to bring Wilcox in to replace Shaw. We could call it pulling an Esquer. As with baseball, the potential/base case of Stanford football is dramatically better than Cal football. Wilcox gets Teevens-esque results at Cal, all the way down to the similarities of a potent defense and a hopeless offensive line. What Wilcox at Stanford would mean for our defense would excite me. It's not crazy to think Wilcox could be a good coach at Stanford. Not one of the first 20 names I'd suggest, but this thread did make me think of the Esquer similarities.
Wilcox supposedly turned down Washington. Why would he accept Stanford job? He’s got a better situation right now.