[msqueri]

To martyup and JJJ, it's fine for us to disagree on that decision or any other. Variety is the spice of life and disagreement is the essence of barroom/message board debate. For what it's worth, I post these thoughts on three different message boards and my football buddy text chain and on one of those message boards there was one or two posters who were especially apoplectic and stark in how they talked about the fourth quarter field goal/punt decision. My wording on that point was more directed at extreme rhetoric than somebody having a different view on the decision. As I said, in my view most "controversial" in-game decisions are in the 60/40 range. Even if I think this one is more in the 75-25 range or something, it's not crazy to be on the opposite side of it.

[msqueri]

To martyup and JJJ, it's fine for us to disagree on that decision or any other. Variety is the spice of life and disagreement is the essence of barroom/message board debate. For what it's worth, I post these thoughts on three different message boards and my football buddy text chain and on one of those message boards there was one or two posters who were especially apoplectic and stark in how they talked about the fourth quarter field goal/punt decision. My wording on that point was more directed at extreme rhetoric than somebody having a different view on the decision. As I said, in my view most "controversial" in-game decisions are in the 60/40 range. Even if I think this one is more in the 75-25 range or something, it's not crazy to be on the opposite side of it.